âIâd recommend this as a reading in so many contexts: In creative writing workshops, in literature seminars, in a methodology course in the social sciences, in any context where the reader is thinking about the ethics of researching and creating across social and political difference--or more specifically about the âobstacles to a meaningful and respectful integration of certain, often womenâs, postcolonial bodies into a global citizenry that is hierarchized.â Glover articulates how Danticat is able to tell stories across categories of boundedness and freedom by insisting that âthe Haitian womanâs body and mind must be tended to in their individuality, and that Black women must be allowed safe spaces within which to bear witness to their own experiences and to tell their own stories, should they decide to do so.â
âI'd love to ask students to read this before we met to talk about archival research methodology. As we discussed western formulations of the archive, reading across the archival grain in the records of predominantly white institutions such as Barnard, and the power in the refusal of the archival gaze, Gloverâs readings of Danticatâs work could ground a discussion of âthe possibility that freedomâthough perhaps most often seized through self-narrating declarationsâmay also very well sound like silence. The question becomes, then, how best to navigate representation so as to avoid the âtheftâ of voice while remaining committed to voicing the unspeakable.ââ - Martha Tenney, Director of Barnard Library Archives & Special Collections